INDEX
Chief Of Divine Alliance
Palace
Justice Organization For
Power Foundation Of Internal Religion
Court Of Divine Alliance
Palace
Divine Alliance Palace
Court And Discipline Board Of Divine Alliance Palace
Harmony Institution Of
Nine Divine-Plane Palace And Local Justice
HIEP THIEN DAI OFFICE THUONG SANH ----------- No.: 138/TS |
GREAT
WAY -THIRD PERIOD - UNIVERSAL SALVATION ( 43RD YEAR ) TAY
NINH HOLY SEE |
Respectfully
addressed to: Gentle Brother Cardinal,
Dear
Gentle Brother,
I
would like to hand over the composition “Justice Organization of Internal Power
Foundation in Religion” composed by the Juridical Renovator [Hiến Pháp], so that you
give an order to publish and propagate in rank of Dignitaries under the
approval of the Sacerdotal Council of Two Palaces organized on 16th
May Mau Than year [11th Jun 1968] with the official report No.
13/VB. Regards,
Holy See, 24th May Year of Monkey
(19th Jun. 1968)
THƯỢNG
SANH
(Signed)
HIEP
THIEN DAI OFFICE ----------- No.:
20-PC/TS |
GREAT
WAY -THIRD PERIOD - UNIVERSAL SALVATION ( 43RD YEAR ) TAY NINH HOLY SEE |
Holy See, 16th February
Mau Than year
[14th March 1968]
Respectfully
addressed to: His Holiness Thuong Sanh
Chief of Divine Alliance Palace
Subject:
Justice Power Foundation and Internal Policy in Religion.
Ref.:
Holy Letter No. 46/TS dated 3rd December Dinh
Mui year [2nd January 1968].
Dear
Sir,
Instead
of “Judgment Law” composed by the Mr. Juridical Legislator [Tiếp
Pháp], I would like to suggest the phrase “Justice
Power Foundation and Internal Religious Policy” to be more meaning. I kindly
attach 05 copies for your kind consideration to submit them to the Great
Assembly for being legalized.
Regards,
JURIDICAL
RENOVATOR
(Signed)
CHAPTER FIRST: Council
· First Clause: Judgment for the Male
Female Disciples, Sub-Dignitaries and Student Priest.
· Second Clause: Convention, audience
of Council.
· Third Clause: Stipulated time of
judgment.
· Fourth Clause: Appeal right of indictee.
· Fifth Clause: Approval right of
Justice Department Chief.
CHAPTER SECOND: Divine Alliance Palace Court
· Sixth Clause: Audience of Divine
Alliance Palace Court.
· Seventh Clause: Judge the Dignitaries
from Priest or Perfecter and up.
· Eighth Clause: Laws applied in
judgment.
· Ninth Clause: Appeal right of indictee.
· Tenth Clause: Amnesty right and right
of quashing a verdict.
CHAPTER THRIRD: Disciplinary Board
· Eleventh Clause: Audience of Disciplinary
Board.
· Twelfth Clause: Judge the rank from
Good Teacher to Male Female Sacrificer of Charity
Body.
· Thirteenth Clause: Laws applied in
judgment.
· Fourteenth Clause: Appeal right of indictee.
· Fifteenth Clause: Right of quashing a
verdict.
· Sixteenth Clause: Amnesty right.
CHAPTER FOURTH: Divine Alliance Palace Court and
Disciplinary Board of Divine Alliance Palace
· Seventeenth Clause: Judge the
Dignitaries of Divine Alliance Palace from the rank Religious Instructor to
Archivist.
· Eighteenth Clause: hold the authority
of guilty Dignitaries before judgment.
· Nineteenth Clause: Judge the
Juridical Agent.
· Twentieth Clause: Disciplinary Board
of Divine Alliance Palace.
· Twenty First Clause: Decided right
and laws applied in judgment.
CHAPTER FIFTH: Conciliation Institution of Nine
Divine-Plane Palace and Local Justice
· Twenty Second Clause:
Conciliation Institution of Nine-Divine-Plane-Palace and local Justice
Dignitaries.
· Twenty Third Clause:
Supplement or amendment.
GREAT WAY-THIRD PERIOD-UNIVERSAL SALVATION
[Forty Third Religious Year]
TAY NINH HOLY SEE
JUSTICE ORGANIZATION
POWER FOUNDATION OF INTERNAL
RELIGIOUS POLICY
We think that the Religion has the
Religious Constitutional Law and New Religious Law as the regulation in
execution, as the Laws that Disciples follow to be peaceful under the Internal
Policy in Religion.
The Justice authority of Religion
belongs to the Divine Alliance Palace’s hold to preserve the True Doctrine
-True Religion.
We think that from Binh Ty year [1936], His Holiness Ho Phap
founded the Justice Department undertaken by the Dharma Branch of Divine
Alliance Palace, which is the organ holding the
Justice authority in the Religious door under the authority of Divine Alliance
Palace - Sacerdotal Council.
In order to keep the Holy Body pure
and elevated, it requires the visible rules, it means to the earthly punishment
organ to help guilty Souls reduce the Celestial punishment. For that reason,
the Sacerdotal Council of Divine Alliance Palace decides to found the Internal Religious
Policy into the Justice Organization allocated as the following:
We think that the New Religious Law
stipulates the Audience of Council simply for foremost Dignitaries of Divine
Alliance Palace as the law protection organization, but it does not contain any
clause stipulating the obligation in application and judgment.
It is referred to the suggestion of
Sacerdotal Council of Nine-Divine-Plane Palace, No. 133/ĐSTT dated 6th
October Dinh Mui year [7th
November 1967] and official report No. 2 of meeting of Sacerdotal
Council-Divine Alliance Palace dated 20th November Dinh Mui year [21st
December 1967], His Holiness Thuong Sanh – Chief of Divine Alliance Palace wrote the Holy
Letter No. 01/TL dated 28th November Dinh Mui year [29th December 1967] to assign and
supplement audience of Council divided into 04 cases:
FIRST CLAUSE:
a) If the indictee is a male
Student Priest:
Chairman: 1
Archbishop (same religious branch over indictee).
Deliberating
person: 2 Bishops (two different religious branches).
Defender: 1
Bishop of same religious branch
Judicator: 1
Dignitary of Justice Department.
Judgment
Secretary: 1 Priest or Student Priest.
b) If the indictee is a
female Student Priest:
Chairman: 1 Male
Archbishop (regardless of Thai, Thuong, Ngoc
Religious Branch).
Deliberating
person: 2 female Bishops.
Defender: 1
female Bishop.
Judicator: 1
Dignitary of Justice Department.
Judgment
Secretary: 1 male Student Priest.
c) If the indictee is the
Sub-Dignitary or male –female Disciple:
Chairman: 1 Male
Archbishop of Ngoc Religious Branch.
Deliberating
person: 2 Priests (male or female, it depends on sex of indictee).
Defender: 1
female Priest (it depends on sex of indictee).
Judicator: 1 Dignitary
of Justice Department.
Judgment
Secretary: 1 male Student Priest.
d) If in lawsuit, there are male and female :
Chairman: 1 Male
Archbishop (any Ngoc, Thuong or Thai Religious
Branch).
Deliberating
person: 2 Bishops or Priests (one male and one female, it depends on Student
Priest or Disciple stipulated above).
Defender: 1
female Bishop or Priest.
Judicator: 1
Dignitary of Justice Department.
Judgment
Secretary: 1 male Student Priest.
SECOND CLAUSE:
· Convoking the audience of Council for
judgment is due to the Decree of Cardinal referred to the selection of
Dignitary of Chief Archbishop of Confucianism or Female Chief Archbishop
governing the Womankind of Nine-Divine-Plane-Palace due to each case.
· The accusing Dignitary is recommended
by the Justice Department.
THIRD CLAUSE:
· When the Council is convoked with
enough judgment documents, must organize meeting to judge within a maximum
period of 3 months (90 days) from the date of receiving the documents.
FOURTH CLAUSE:
· The verdict judged by the Council
must be approved by two Governors of Justice Department. It is then enforced.
The indictee has no right to appeal because the
judgment is absolute and final.
FIFTH CLAUSE:
· In the case, the Governor of Justice
Department does not agree with the judgment decided by the Council (light or
strict verdict), this person will return the documents to the Cardinal to
convoke another Council with different audience for re-judging.
We think that the
Nine-Divine-Plane-Palace does not have enough advance Dignitaries to found the
Three-Religion Court of Nine Divine Planes Palace to judge the illegal
Dignitaries from the rank Priest and up.
Referring to the Official Report No.
6/VB of meeting organized on 19th March Binh
Ngo [9th April 1966), the Sacerdotal Council of Divine Alliance
Palace temporarily founds the Divine Alliance Palace Court to judge the illegal
Dignitaries breaking the Religious law of Nine Divine Planes Palace from the
rank of Priest and up. It is applied to the rank of Perfector
and up in the Charity Body. Consequently, His Holiness Thuong
Sanh-Chief of Divine Alliance Palace issued the Holy
Order No. 60/TL dated 24th March Binh Ngo
year (11th April 1966) to found the “Divine Alliance Palace Court”
to judge the Dignitaries from the rank of Priest and Perfector
and up. The Audience is done as the following:
SIXTH CLAUSE:
· The audience of Divine Alliance
Palace Court:
Chairman: 1
Dignitary of Twelve Zodiacal Dignitaries.
Deliberating
person: 2 General Inspectors.
Defender: 1
Lawyer and 1 Dignitary of Nine Divine Planes Palace or Charity Body, who has
the same rank with the indictee.
Judicator: 1
Investigator.
Judgment
Secretary: 1 Investigator or Archivist.
SEVENTH CLAUSE:
· The Divine Alliance Palace Court has
the right to judge the Dignitaries breaking the Religious law from the rank
Priest or Perfector and up. The affair documents are
due to the investigation submitted by the Justice Department.
EIGHTH CLAUSE:
· The Divine Alliance Palace Court will
base on the following laws to judge the illegal Dignitaries:
1. Religious Constitution.
2. New Religious Code.
3. Eight Religious Decrees.
4. Ten Punishments of His Holiness
Spiritual Pope.
5. Religious Law in Mau Dan year.
6. The Legal precedents long since.
NINETIETH CLAUSE:
· The Divine Alliance Palace Court’s
verdict is the final judgment, but it requires the approval of the Chief of
Divine Alliance Palace
TENTH CLAUSE:
· The right of quashing verdict and
amnesty belongs to the highest decision of Chief of Divine Alliance Palace. The
present Chief is Rev. Thuong Sanh.
· The quashing a verdict happens when
in the trial, there is somebody who does not execute correctly due to his
obligation, or he sentences without the authentic or illegal factor. Rev. Thuong Sanh decides Himself or
confers with Dignitaries of Twelve Zodiacal Dignitaries to quash the verdict and turn to
the Divine Alliance Palace Court with another audience for re-judging.
· For amnesty, it belongs to the
special authority of Rev. Thuong Sanh
without the idea of the Sacerdotal Council of Divine Alliance Palace.
We think that the Religious Law in
Mau Dan year (1938) founding the Charity Body with Twelve ranks in parallel
with the Dignitaries of Nine Divine Planes Palace. The Dignitaries are divided
from the Perfector and up, who belong to the Holy
Body. The Good Teacher and down belong the human beings. However, the Charity
Body was under the authority of His Holiness Ho Phap
over aspects of reward and punishment. Nowadays, His Holiness Ho Phap returned the Divine throne, therefore the proceedings
or offences of Religion from the rank Good Teacher and down Sacrificer
have no the Judgment Council as the Nine Divine Planes Palace.
Referring to the Official Report No.
6/VB of meeting organized on 19th March Binh
Ngo year (9th April 1966), the Sacerdotal Council of Divine Alliance
Palace decides to found the Discipline Board for the Charity Body to judge the
Good Teach and down. Therefore, Rev. Thuong Sanh gives a Holy Order No. 61/TL dated 24th
March Binh Ngo year (14th April 1966) to
found the Discipline Board for the Charity Body.
ELEVENTH CLAUSE:
This audience of
Discipline Board includes:
Chairman: 1 Chon
Nhon.
Deliberating
person: 2 Dao Nhon.
Defender: 1 Chi Thien/Perfector.
Accuser: 1 Chi Thien/Perfector.
Judgment
Secretary: 1 Good Teacher/Giao Thien.
TWELFTH CLAUSE:
· This Discipline Board has the
authority to judge the proceedings or offences over the rank Good Teacher down
to Sacrificer belonging to male and female of Charity
Body.
THIRTEENTH CLAUSE:
· This Discipline Board will base on
the laws stipulated in the eighth clause for judgment and punishment decision
over indictee.
FOURTEENTH CLAUSE:
· This Discipline Board gives a final
judgment and has the authority to decide the deporting verdict as the Council
of Nine Divine Planes Palace. However, the verdict must have an approval of
Chief of Justice Department.
FIFTEENTH CLAUSE:
· The quashing the verdict belongs to
the decision of the Zodiacal Dignitaries of Male Female Charity Body.
· The quashing the verdict must be
showed the reasonable cause with the approval of the Zodiacal Dignitary of
Chief of Justice Department. After that, the affair is then handed over another
Discipline Board with new audience to ref-judging.
ơ
SIXTEENTH CLAUSE:
· The highest amnesty authority belongs
to Rev. Thuong Sanh – Chief
of Divine Alliance Palace.
Referring to
the Official Report No. 8/VB of meeting organized on 2nd
April Binh Ngo year (21st May 1966), the
Sacerdotal Council of Divine Alliance Palace decides to found the Divine
Alliance Palace Court to judge the Dignitaries of Divine Alliance Palace from
the rank of Instructor down to Archivist if they break the Religious law with a
serious sin. If the sin is light, the affair is judged by the Divine Alliance
Palace’s Discipline Board.
For the Student of Law who has not been listed in the Dignitary,
therefore they will be judged by the Discipline Board despite their light or
serious sin.
SEVENTEENTH CLAUSE:
· The Dignitaries of Divine Alliance
Palace from the rank Instructor down Archivist breaking the Religious law will
be judged by the Divine Alliance Palace Court if the sin is serious with the
audience stipulated in the Holy Order No. 60/TL dated 24th March Binh Ngo year (21st May 1966) and stipulated in
the 6th clause.
· Regardless of Dignitaries of Divine
Alliance Palace, Nine Divine Planes Palace or Charity Body, they are always
under judgment of Divine Alliance Palace Court. Everybody is under same
judgment.
EIGHTEENTH CLAUSE:
· In the case of illegal Dignitary who
had been recommended into the audience of Divine Alliance Palace Court, the
Sacerdotal Council needs to replace another Dignitary before judgment.
NINETEENTH CLAUSE:
· For Student of Law despite of serious
or light sin, he/she will be judged by the Discipline Board. This Discipline
Board has the authority as the Council of Nine Divine Planes Palace.
TWENTIETH CLAUSE:
· The Discipline Board of Divine
Alliance Palace is unpermanent. It is set up when it
is necessary and it depends on the rank of indictee
in audience selection approved by the order of Chief of Divine Alliance Palace.
TWENTY FIRST CLAUSE:
· The sin of indictee
Dignitary is listed to the serious or light sin due to the authority of Chief
of Justice Department’s sinful decision referred to the ten punishments of
Spiritual Pope stipulated in the Religious Law of Mau Dan year (1938) and
present laws.
We think that the Harmony Institution of Nine Divine-Plane Palace is the
constituent justice in the administration of Sacerdotal Council of Nine
Divine-Plane Palace with the authority to consider and maintain the justice
among Dignitaries, Sub-Dignitaries and Disciples. Therefore, it has the
authority to reconcile and personal proceedings, which are not concerned to the
Religion. Besides, the persons with the serious sin must be decided by the
Justice Department.
TWENTY SECOND CLAUSE:
· The Harmony Institution of Nine
Divine-Plane Palace and Dignitaries of local justice are the branches of
Justice Department with the authority of reconciling, of accepting withdrawing
a complaint, of agreeing the normal sins. Besides, other affairs must be
submitted to the Justice Department for judgment.
TWENTY THIRD CLAUSE:
· The Justice Organization Board of
Internal Religious Policy in this Great Way – Third Period – Universal
Salvation will be supplemented or amended due to every stage and Religious
progress.
Holy See, 6th February Mau Than year
(4th March 1968)
Juridical Renovator
(Signed)
TÀI
LIỆU LƯU HÀNH NỘI BỘ
[FOR
INTERNAL CIRCULATION ONLY]
Bản dịch
anh ngữ QUYỀN TƯ PHÁP NỘI
TRỊ ĐẠO này chưa
hoàn chỉnh, vẫn là bản
thảo, chờ bổ khuyết chỉnh sửa. Khi hoàn thành, bản quyền sẽ dâng lên
cho Hội Thánh.
Kỷ niệm Mùa Xuân Di Lặc
Năm Giáp Ngọ
(2014)
Khai Tâm Quách
Minh Chương